<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?> 
<rss version="0.91"> 
<channel> 
<title>QuaSSI News and Events</title> 
<link>http://qssi.psu.edu/</link> 
<description>Quantitative Social Science Initiative (QuaSSI): Upcoming QuaSSI and Campus Events</description> 
<language>en-us</language> 
<copyright>qssi.psu.edu</copyright> 
<item>
<title>QuaSSI Symposium, Quantitative Political History on May 20.</title>
<link>http://qssi.psu.edu/quaph.html</link>
<description>Featuring talks by Jeffery Jenkins (Virginia), Benjamin Valentino (Dartmouth), and Daniel Ziblatt (Harvard). Lunch will be provided.  </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>QuaSSI Conference, New Faces in Political Methodology on May 3.</title>
<link>http://qssi.psu.edu/newfaces.html</link>
<description></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>QuaSSI Seminar, &quot;Circular Modeling of Human Behavior: Directional statistics and cosine curve modeling applied to interpersonal functioning.&quot; to be offered by Aidan Wright (Psychology and QuaSSI, PSU) on April 9.</title>
<link>http://qssi.psu.edu/seminars.html#wright</link>
<description>  

A light lunch will be provided.  </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>QuaSSI Workshop, &quot;GIS software and spatial statistics tools: Do they measure up?  Comparing Ripley's K-function analysis in ArcMap, CrimeStat, and SpatStat (R)&quot; to be offered by Gregory Luna (Anthropology and QuaSSI, PSU) on March 19.</title>
<link>http://qssi.psu.edu/seminars.html#luna</link>
<description>  

A light lunch will be provided.  </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>QuaSSI Workshop, &quot;An Introduction to Causal Inference Using Propensity Score Matching&quot; to be offered by Satvika Chalasani (Sociology, Demography, and QuaSSI, PSU) on January 28.</title>
<link>http://qssi.psu.edu/seminars.html#chalasani</link>
<description>  Understanding causal relationships is central to understanding social phenomena. Yet, relatively few social scientists attempt to explicitly demonstrate causality in their work. In large part, this stems from the very nature of observational data such as surveys and censuses. Assignment of individuals to independent variables tends to be nonrandom, which then means that in a simple regression model, the explanatory variable indicating assignment to treatment will be correlated with the error term. Experimental data avert precisely this problem by randomizing assignment to treatment. However, experimental designs are often not feasible in the social sciences for a multitude of reasons. Matching methods such as the propensity score model use counterfactual reasoning and attempt to simulate an experiment using observational data. This talk will serve as an introduction to the motivations for using propensity scores, the fundamental logic of counterfactual models, and a step-by-step breakdown of how to implement a propensity score model. 

A light lunch will be provided.  </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>QuaSSI Seminar, &quot;Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects from 2×2 and 2×2xK Tables in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding&quot; to be offered by Kevin Quinn (Department of Government, Harvard) on January 18.</title>
<link>http://qssi.psu.edu/seminars.html#quinn</link>
<description>  What, if anything, should one infer about the causal effect of a binary treatment on a binary outcome from a 2×2 cross-tabulation of non-experimental data? Many researchers would answer "nothing" because of the likelihood of severe bias due to the lack of adjustment for key confounding variables. This paper shows that such a conclusion is unduly pessimistic. Because the complete data likelihood under arbitrary patterns of confounding factorizes in a particularly convenient way, it is possible to parameterize this general situation with four easily interpretable parameters. Subjective beliefs regarding these parameters are easily elicited and honest subjective statements of uncertainty about causal effects become possible. This paper also develops a novel graphical display we call the confounding plot that quickly and efficiently communicates all patterns of confounding that would leave a particular causal inference relatively unchanged. This simple graph is so easy to generate and so informative that there is no reason it should not be a part of every analysis that attempts to make causal inferences from a 2×2 table. 

A light lunch will be provided.  </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>QuaSSI Seminar, &quot;The Puzzling Nature of Success in Cultural Markets&quot; to be offered by Matthew Salganik (Department of Sociology, Princeton) on October 15.</title>
<link>http://qssi.psu.edu/seminars.html#salganik</link>
<description>  This talk is motivated by a puzzling aspect of contemporary cultural
markets: successful cultural products, such as hit songs, bestselling
books, and blockbuster movies, are orders of magnitude more successful
than average; yet which particular songs, books, and movies will become
the next "big thing" appears impossible to predict. Here we propose that
both of these features, which appear to be contradictory at the
collective level, can arise from the process of social influence at the
individual level. To explore this possibility empirically we constructed
a website where participants could listen to, rate, and download new
music, and more importantly, where we could control the information that
these participants had about the behavior of others. Using a novel
experimental design we found support for our ideas in a series of four
experiments involving a total of 27,267 participants.

A light lunch will be provided.  </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>QuaSSI Workshop, &quot;Introduction to Functional MRI for Social Scientists&quot; to be offered by Melissa Robinson (Department of Neuroscience and QuaSSI, Penn State) on September 10.</title>
<link>http://qssi.psu.edu/seminars.html#robinson</link>
<description>Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is an imaging technique that indirectly measures brain activity by detecting blood oxygenation level dynamics that are believed to be the result of active neuronal communities.

Since the early 1990's, fMRI has become one of most popular and powerful imaging techniques. fMRI has been utilized by several different fields, such as neuroscience, psychology, sociology, and medicine, and has been innovative in helping clinicians and researchers in diagnosing pathologies and understanding brain function in animals and humans.

The workshop will focus on the basics involved in fMRI studies and include explanations regarding: 1) the biological response fMRI is based upon 2) basic components and physics of fMRI and equipment 3) fMRI designs and studies 4) fMRI data analysis 5) and fMRI study examples.

A light lunch will be provided.  </description>
</item>
</channel> 
</rss> 

